INCLUDE_DATAINCLUDE_DATA

Archive for » 2007 «

Nov
15

All of my short stories are out looking for a home now. Okay, the last one I just taped up in it’s envelope. But it’s ready to go.

I need a break from my refractive surgery book, so I’m going to write a short story. I am almost overwhelmed by the possibilities in character, setting, etc. But the plot is eluding me. That’s why I’m going to bed.

I call it tummy time. I’m not sure why, but my brainstorming seems to work best in a dark room on my tummy. In our last house we had the perfect room for this. It was our media room, so it could be completely darkened and it was right next to the computer room. I would come to a stuck part and go into the room. Vovka used to think I was sleeping, and I’d say “No, I’m working”. In fact, I was working really hard. I would fall asleep sometimes, but that would be okay. Any dreaming I’d do was soaked in my story, and I’d often wake up with the answer.

I do good editing on my tummy too.

Category: Writing  Leave a Comment
Nov
12

I’ve always thought it somewhat unfair that we “learn from our mistakes”. Mistakes being the euphemism for sins, for doing something wrong, immoral, inethical. We do something wrong, and gain from it.

I realized in communicating with a friend that this isn’t quite true, and then the concept made a bit more sense.

Anyone can ‘make a mistake’. Everyone does and we all do it all the time. But learning from it takes repentance.

Repentance as I understand it is basically this: First of all, we need to understand it’s wrong and then feel bad for what we’ve done. Then we confess. Apologize to the person, come to someone with higher authority if it is serious (This is to get spiritual counseling and guidance as we continue through this process). Make reparations if possible. If we are Christian, the next step is to come unto Christ. More on that later. And the last step is to never do the thing again.

These are such simple steps, but repeated application of them yields a lot of learning. And without them, we don’t learn from our mistakes.

There is no knowledge gained in bad conduct, but there is in improving our conduct.

There are several reasons why I think Christ is important to the process. First of all, the Christian understands that even the tiniest mark on our soul makes us unworthy to be in God’s presence. Therefore, coming to Christ erases that mark. Second, the Grace of Christ is not simply a get out of jail free card. When Christ suffered for our sins, he truly did. He understands the physical, emotional, and spiritual consequences of having committed the sin and so, through the Holy Ghost, can counsel us. And we can know that he understands our deepest evil, our deepest pain and he still loves us.

The concept of repentance in Christianity is not a letting go of responsibility, but a path to improve ourselves. We are constantly and throughout our life called to repentance. Repentance appears to the world around us as an improvement in our behavior and attitude towards our fellowman. It has practical and good applications in the building up of society. Christ and all of his prophets have constantly taught repentance, and this is another reason Christ is important to it. His church provides for us the constant reminder that we need to repent.

The other side of the coin of repentance is forgiveness. Through repentance and forgiveness we can put our baggage behind us and move forward.

This is why I’m not of the ‘once saved always saved’ school of thought. Well, being Mormon I never was and once I heard it the concept never appealed to me. Salvation is an ongoing building of a beautiful relationship with Christ. We come to him again and again, and we learn by his Grace.

Nov
04

Two chapters and an introduction are in finished draft form. Tomorrow, I’m going to be starting on my proposal. This part is both exciting and scary. It is in the proposal that I get to sell my book to someone. Include sample chapters. An outline. Why I’m the one to write it. How to market it. I’m most scared about why I’m the one to write it, and I’m most excited about how to market it because I have several viable and unique ways to market it. I believe this book will practically sell itself. I sincerely wish I would have had it as I looked into getting my eye surgery.

But the proposal isn’t what I send out. First I’ll need to send out a query. Make up a list of appropriate agents. I think I’ll send it out to 20 at a time. How am I going to rank them? Hrm. My very first choice would be someone who could also represent me well as a fiction author. Jabberwocky seems to have that, but they’ve just started in the non-fiction. So do they have the network for non-fiction? How much do non-fiction and fiction networks overlap?

Wish I had a map.

Category: Writing  5 Comments
Oct
28

So a couple of posts back I whined that my story, “Quantum Genesis” had become derivative after I wrote it but before I’ve gotten it published. It was out to Analog, and it got rejected this week. Not surprised. It probably got rejected that much later after the episode aired only because it hadn’t been read yet. These guys get something like 800 manuscripts a month and have a stated return time of 4 weeks! Kudos. But you know… The last couple things I sent them came back in like 2 weeks. This took longer almost the 4 weeks in fact. Wonder if that means it got farther along? I don’t know. I’ve never received a personal rejection from these guys, and I have from every other editor.

So I went to grab an envelope to send it out tomorrow. Then a couple of things came to mine. The post I mentioned, and the critique I recieved from Writer’s of the Future that this story was really, really great and would have made finalist had it not had a quantum entanglement theme. And it suddenly hits me. A subtle change in the fictional science, and it’s not quantum entanglement. And it is way better than before.

Oh man! I have been working on this story for five years. Okay, make that three years because two of those years I was in happy mommy land. I’m always very content and creative in a lot of other ways, but not writing. Wierd. Anyway… Ollie, a writer friend of mine, has rightly begged me to stop fixing it. I want to! I really do. But now I can’t send it out. It is possible, it really is, that it may be only a few sentences of fixing. The last fix involved removing about 3 pages. Cathartic.

Possibilities. Send story out as is and fix it in novel. Or fix story. If it is only a few sentences, then I really can’t leave it.

In other news: Two draft chapters of the refractive surgery book are finished, but I need to go over them. I’m not sure if I want to go through them or work on the next chapter I’ll be sending out with my proposal, the one about LASIK. After that chapter, I’ll work on the proposal. This is taking a long time, because really I am a mom before I am a writer. But it is just like when I started walking, then running, losing 50 lbs, and keeping it off now for almost two years. Discipline. Do it nearly every day, even if only a few minutes, if only a bit of research gets done or a couple of sentences get written. It does add up.

Category: Writing  2 Comments
Oct
06

Sometimes, I wish there was less I wanted to do. For instance, I don’t decorate my house much, nor sew, nor do lots of crafty stuff that I actually think is fun. I enjoy this kind of thing. I want a pretty house decorated with things I made and kids dressed fantastically in clothes I made and a scrapbook and to give out handmade cards always. I want to make the place I live in appear to be the thing of beauty that is in our hearts.

But I want to write more.

One of my heroes is someone named Ellis R. Shipp. There is a lot that biography leaves out, of course. One of the things was that she was always, always curious about the world around her and always nurturing. Her taking on the calling to become a doctor was very much in line with her personality. Brigham Young called several women to go back east, learn medicine, and come back to practice and educate. It was actually a church calling extended to these women. Ellis was troubled to leave her children, but passionate about the work.

One of the reasons she could even dream of this career was that her husband was a polygamist. Ironic? Not what you thought polygamy was about? In this day and age where early Mormons practiced polygamy, women were encouraged to pursue their talents. In order to support such families, some of the wives had to work too. The sister wives more inclined to homemaking would take care of the children. These arrangements were actually very friendly towards women and their diversity of talents. The kinds of jobs they took were still very much of a ‘womanly nature’ though. Teaching, medicine and midwifery, sewing, etc. But the fact of the matter is that women under these circumstances were among the most progressive of all their peers across the world. They could vote well before their counterparts back east, until the US federal government took that right away for several years. They started the first women’s organization (and now the oldest). The Women’s Exponent (1872-1914 independent) and The Relief Society Magazine (1915-1970 church run, started after TWE failed due to financial difficulties) were magazines run by and for women.  

So, polygamists good? Well… the divorce rate was pretty high too. That says something about how it often turned out. In fact, Ellis Shipp’s sister wife, the second wife of her husband, divorced him. I am sure that one of the reasons Wilford Woodruff recieved revelation that it was time for this practice to stop, was because many men were practicing it unrighteously. By that, I mean, rather than marrying women to provide husbands for them (at a time when there were a shortage of men and lots of widows) it was becoming tradition to, say, have your daughter marry into an ‘old’ and well known (if not rich) polygamous family. Men were entering into polygamous marriages without being called to. You see, polygamy only works well under very limited circumstances and and when men are very righteous. Once those have expired and/or men start to act on their lusts, (Both of these happening at the time it was discontinuted in the LDS church) then polygamy becomes very destructive to women and it is time to stop. The ‘fundamentalist’ mormons of today who practice polygamy give us good examples of just how bad it can get when practiced unrighteously. (Kingstons, Greens, Warren Jeffs)

But even in modern times, it can be practiced righteously. I once heard a former police officer who had been investigating these societies in Utah say he had met a man who was “practicing righteously”. Basically, this was a Christian man who had married and was a good husband to several women who wanted marriage but were more or less unmarriagable due to disability or appearance. Odd and warm fuzzy like all at the same time, yeah?

So from a legal standpoint, should we allow polygamy? My answer? Yes. This article pretty much describes my thinking.) Should we practice it? No.

Oct
03

Sigh.

I have a short fiction piece out to a magazine. I just watched a TV show tonight, Eureka, in which a character has a very similar theme going.

I feel so derivative.

Yeah, that is me feeling sorry for myself, but it is also me knowing that there is a very good chance this means the story is unsellable in the major markets.

I have a novel idea from this short story. That grand epic has enough difference that the similarity doesn’t really matter any more. But the short, which is only the nugget of a beginning, may suffer.

But back to a point. I rarely watch TV. I really don’t want to write something that is so common it is on TV. But how am I supposed to do that? And now onto the other problem: reading. If there is anything a writer must do, it is read books and stories. I feel so out of touch. There are so many things I simply don’t have time to read. Bah, this is frustrating.

Goes back to hug the comforting non-fiction she is reading and writing.

Dang. My story is 5 years old. Too bad I wasn’t a good enough writer then to figure out how to fix it.

Category: Writing  One Comment
Sep
30

Recently, I watched part of a Russian documentary on mail order brides with my husband. He told me what the rest of it had shown. My initial reaction when he told me what he was watching was that it would be about how evil America was for exploiting these women. He said, no, actually, it was pretty even handed. Much of the explotation came from the Russian centered companies involved in recruiting the women. Some of the matches lead to ‘happily ever after’ as well, though there were a few horror stories. Sometimes it was the gold digging woman taking advantage of a well off shy man. Mostly it was abusive men looking for a wife who would tolerate it. 

Vladimir and I have witnessed both kinds of couples, though only one of them was through a matching service. One thing they all have in common is a way that Russian women seem to have been damaged by Russian culture as a whole. I think I can honestly say that I have not met one that didn’t show signs of being consistantly treated as a lesser person than men. Until now, this had only been personal observation of a relatively small group of people, but interestingly I found my observation validated in this show. A female psychologist on the show explained that Russian culture had produced women that are more submissive and dependent, causing them to be desirable to a certain subset of American men who are, for obvious reasons, having a hard time finding a woman in America that will have them. She went on to say that American women were generally more independent and strong than Russian women. She skirted around the real issue:

The number of women abused in Russia is astounding and deeply disturbing.

Amnesty International Women’s Day

How does one heal an entire culture from this?

My husband is the son of an abusive husband, but his mom wouldn’t tolerate it. She divorced her husband despite very harsh taboos. Now, I’m not one to condone divorce, but the taboo against divorce is still so strong that many women stay with abusive men. It isn’t just the taboo, though. They feel helpless because the problem is so widespread that they expect it from every man. So why bother? You know your monster, why switch for a new one?

An interesting aspect to this is that all of this taboo against divorce, all of this acceptance of abuse occured not under a religious construct but a decidedly anti-religious government. Church marriages were not recognized, nor was there any ceremony involved. The couples simply signed a paper, the government stamped it, and they were married. Women were equal in education and employment. This state was a secular dream.

And yet, a female PhD I know of tolerated a drunken, abusive spouse because that was the way of it. 

Independence? Again, the culture is against it. A woman can actually have a harder time at the banks and other beauracracies without a husband. My mother in law recently attempted to complete a real estate transaction and found it literally impossible without a bribe so high as to make selling the place not worth it. They would not have required such a bribe from a man (Though of course a bribe certainly would have been part of it). But apart from this socially imposed block against independence, she does not feel she can do this. She called us for every little thing. My husband spent hours on the phone with her, coaching her (and remember she was in Russia and he hasn’t been there for 17 years), telling her she could do it, going over things with her, only to have her call back after her particular errand and say she’d gotten scared or forgotten something.

This woman was abused not only by her husband, but her father before her. I am amazed she did leave her husband. But I strongly feel that her action nearly 40 years ago broke the cycle, because my husband is not abusive.

American women had it better than this even in the worst of times.

How does one cure an entire culture of this kind of sickness? It certainly would take generations to heal, but I don’t even know where one could begin.

Sep
23

Looking at a picture of some of my children that included my nearly oldest (nearly 15) and my youngest who is 2, I realized that he would view this picture in later years as one with someone who was part of his early childhood. My daughter will be going to college, etc when he is around 6 years old.

She will have had a childhood full of her brother and sisters, except her first 28 months. He will watch his sisters leave him behind, one by one, until around the age of 11, when he will become the only child at home. Of course, maybe they’ll stay home while they are at college if it is local and they’ll visit. Of course the siblings will keep up a relationship. But they will be adults while he is a child.

In a lot of ways he is an oldest all over, or maybe an only child while having had more mothers than a child really needs. Can’t get away with anything. OTOH, we attribute some of his mad early learning skillz to tons of interaction. When someone is tired, there is always someone else.

He does recognize my 9 year old as the sibling that needs to be rivaled with, though. I wonder what will happen when they are the only two at home?

 

Category: Parenting  3 Comments
Sep
20

So tell me, should a middle school math teacher seat children ranked, according to their grades, with the best in front and the worst in back?

 

Sep
18

I am stumbling on how to write what should be a simple part of my book, describing refractive errors. Why? Because I keep on wondering what and how much I should explain. Like, should I get into convex and concave lenses, and describe how the angle of light is changed? I keep asking myself, what audience am I writing for? How much is overkill and how much is not enough? How much do they want to know, and how much do they need to know in order to make a fully informed decision? Where does the line between geek and healthily informed lie?

I know my audience will at least be the kind that would consult a book before making a decision. But that doesn’t always guarantee a lot in the way of ability to understand.

On one of the LASIK horror story sites, a 28 yr old doctor who is a practicing family physician wrote about how bad of an outcome he had, with a slight overcorrection of +0.5 D. The way he wrote his entire story made me cringe. There was clearly a lack of understanding the difference between anectodal vs statistical evidence. He seemed panicky and not very well informed about the very procedure he was to have done on himself, except to not have his eyes done bilaterally. I have never had LASIK and knew far more than he did. (Is that where geek factor comes in?)

Anyway, I really wouldn’t want this guy as my physician.

But his story is not so unusual. People have outcomes they are pretty satisfied with, and then stumble onto these sites and suddenly they are upset and frightened, and convinced their doctor was evil and misled them. I wrote about researching those sites a few months ago, and recently got an interesting comment on that article about how those sites caused a satisfied patient’s anxiety, when she didn’t have any before.

As I read the one tonight, I was very disturbed by the heavy legal leaning it had. This one clearly seemed to me to be a recruiting site for litigation lawyers to fish for people to sue doctors. It certainly is to their advantage that previously satisfied refractive surgery patients become scared that they’ll go blind or live in debilitating pain for the rest of their lives.

Who really is seeking to make the big bucks in this business?